Agreedio

ConditionalConditional · Phase 3

Change orders would ship only if the retained workflow needs them.

This conditional Phase 3 module would help prepare scope changes against an existing agreement and approved playbook. A signed change would return as an amendment candidate for review. It would not accept work on behalf of a counterparty or overwrite the current baseline automatically.

Try the sample agreementJoin the preview

No sales call required

Change order · scope adjustmentConditionalFictional sample

CO-2 · adds one landing page per month

  • Monthly fee6,500 → 7,100
  • Term endunchanged

Phase 3. A change order is prepared from the current confirmed terms and becomes an amendment candidate once signed through your existing process.

Interactive preview · fictional sampleA conditional change-order draft mapped to agreed scope and routed back as an amendment candidate.

Why this is labelled the way it is

This ships only if retained paying customers repeatedly need change-order preparation, at least five share the same recurring job, and marginal support, processing and attach economics hold.

01Conditional

Extra scope would be mapped to agreed scope.

If this ships, the user would describe the proposed change and compare it with confirmed agreement scope. Missing approval, price or dependency details would remain unresolved.

Change order · scope adjustmentConditionalFictional sample

CO-2 · adds one landing page per month

  • Monthly fee6,500 → 7,100
  • Term endunchanged

Phase 3. A change order is prepared from the current confirmed terms and becomes an amendment candidate once signed through your existing process.

The conditional draft compares proposed scope with the current agreement record.

02Conditional

Commercial changes would be prepared for review.

Fees, dates and affected obligations would be drafted from approved inputs and deterministic calculations. The draft would still need human review before export or signature.

Proposal · Alder Works design retainerConditionalFictional sample

Proposal-V1 · from approved inputs

Monthly fee
USD 6,000
Initial term
12 months
Scheduled fees
USD 72,000 (6,000 × 12)
Exclusions
Advertising spend, additional development

Refused: “guaranteed 30% sales growth” — not in the approved inputs.

Phase 3, only if retained customers need it. Drafts use approved inputs; unsupported claims are refused. The signed terms then link to the agreement record.

Approved inputs would constrain scope, price and dependency changes.

03Conditional

Playbook differences would not become universal risk scores.

The module may compare a proposed clause with the user's approved positions. It would label source-supported differences and uncertainty, not claim a universal legal-risk score.

AGR-0142 · Design retainer — Alder WorksFictional sample

Design retainer — Alder Works

CustomerStatement of workMaya Okafor

Governing sources

  • SOW-S1 (signed, 21 Sep 2026)
  • Amendment A1 (signed, 15 Mar 2027)
  • Schedule 2 (attachment, not governing)
Amendment A1 § 3
Either party may give notice not to renew at least ninety (90) calendar days before the end of the term.

Confirmed by Maya Okafor on 18 Mar 2027, based on Amendment A1 § 3.

Record context would show source-supported differences without legal scoring.

04Conditional

Signed changes would enter amendment review.

A completed change order would be imported and reviewed as an amendment candidate. A confirmed effect could then supersede affected future actions, as Amendment A1 does in the sample.

Amendment A1 — Alder Works retainer · Review what changedFictional sample

Imported 15 Mar 2027 · effective 1 Apr 2027

Candidate · B1 still governs
FieldBefore (SOW-S1)After (A1)
Monthly feeUSD 6,000USD 6,500
Notice period60 calendar days90 calendar days
Initial term end30 Sep 2027unchanged

Effect on the notice date

1 Aug 2027 → 2 Jul 2027

30 Sep 2027 − 90 calendar days. 5 pending reminders would be superseded; sent ones stay in history.

Scheduled initial-term fees

USD 72,000 → USD 75,000

12 months, no proration, tax or early termination modelled.

New terms need review. The prior confirmed schedule remains visible; do not assume it reflects this amendment.

The amendment review would confirm what the signed change actually changed.

How it works

How this would work, if it ships.

Conditional on retained customers needing it. The steps below describe the intended behaviour, not an available feature.
  1. 01

    Start from an existing confirmed record

    The conditional flow would use the current agreement, sources and owner as context.

  2. 02

    Describe the proposed scope change

    Missing commercial terms, dates or dependencies would be flagged for review.

  3. 03

    Review and export the change order

    A person would approve the version before any external signing process.

  4. 04

    Import the signed change

    The signed copy would become an amendment candidate, not an automatic baseline change.

What it does not do.

  • It is conditional Phase 3 work and may never ship if demand or economics do not hold.
  • It would not send counterparty messages, accept work or approve scope autonomously.
  • It would not provide a universal legal-risk score or legal advice.
  • It would not overwrite the current agreement baseline until a signed change is reviewed and confirmed.
  • It would not include procurement, invoicing, accounting or project delivery management.

Related.

Common questions.

Start with one agreement.

Open the fictional sample and walk it from import to a renewal decision. When the paid beta opens, upload one agreement you are authorised to share.

Try the sample agreementJoin the preview